The general manager contacted the police, who secured the room and obtained the hotel's records for the room. 1535, 140 L.Ed.2d 685 (1998). Cooper met Chandler the next morning at 7:05 a.m.; when asked why he looked grubby, Chandler replied that he had been out on his boat all night. While Chandler never admitted to the killings, Kristal testified that he likewise never claimed innocence. This claim is without merit. We agree. Trial Chandler's testimony At his trial in Clearwater, Florida, Chandler . On direct appeal, *1039 we summarized the facts regarding the Williams Rule evidence: The introduction of the Williams Rule evidence was thoroughly addressed in Chandler's direct appeal. Share Save. There is no proof, therefore, in the record, of the mitigating factor of child abuse, or a deprived childhood. The robbery victims also testified about the details of those crimes. 7162 Reading Rd Ste 400 Cincinnati, OH 45237. 400 So.2d at 1219. Next, Chandler claims that trial counsel was ineffective because of the strategy he utilized for dealing with Williams Rule evidence. At the evidentiary hearing, Chandler's trial counsel testified that this opening statement was part of the strategy to keep Chandler's Fifth Amendment rights intact and that if he had denied the alleged sexual battery in his opening it might have opened the door to the State to cross-examine Chandler on it. Chandler told them that he knew the area and that . The trial judge in her order denying Chandler postconviction relief stated that both Chandler and his trial counsel knew that she would try to pick the jury from Hillsborough County before granting a change of venue. We affirm the trial court's denial of relief on this claim. The caller did not give a first name, although he identified his boat as Gypsy One. Dr. Judy Blair is a Psychiatrist in San Quentin, CA. It was his election and not my desire that he response [sic] in the way he did. Freeman v. State, 761 So.2d 1055, 1061 (Fla. 2000) (citations omitted). We find that Chandler is likewise not entitled to relief. 657, 154 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), and denied relief. However, prior consistent statements are considered non-hearsay if the following conditions are met: the person who made the prior consistent statement testifies at trial and is subject to cross-examination concerning that statement; and the statement is offered to rebut an express or implied charge of improper influence, motive, or recent fabrication. Rodriguez, 609 So.2d at 500 (quoting section 90.801(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1989)). He then dragged her out of the car, punched her face against a rock, strangled her, and stabbed her in the neck, arms, legs, and buttocks. Chandler raises seven claims of error on appeal.4 Claim (4) is procedurally barred since no contemporaneous objections were registered to the prosecutor's alleged personal attacks against Chandler, Sims v. State, 681 So.2d 1112, 1116-17 (Fla.1996) cert. at 659-60. Judy Mogul Video Testimony (Transcript and Exhibits previously released) Maggie Moran Transcript Exhibits John Maggiore Transcript Exhibits Matt McGrath Transcript Exhibits Harold Moore Transcript Exhibits Jefrey Pollock Transcripts Exhibits Larry Schwartz Transcript Exhibits Lis Smith Video Testimony (Transcript and Exhibits previously released) judy blair identified. Counsel must indicate whether, based on his investigation, he reasonably believes there to be mitigating evidence that could be presented and what that evidence would be. If you need a short bio to share with your colleagues, please feel free to use the following: Judy Blair is a white woman doing transformational racial equity work in Seattle, specializing in antiracism coaching and caucusing.Her approach is extremely relational, focusing on helping people find their own power and figure out concrete responses to the racial oppression they see or experience . [6] At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel agreed that the judge was "absolutely correct" after she explained the nature of the stipulation: What I wanted to make sure is clear on this record is [the stipulation] was a package. The jury recommended a death sentence for each of the murders by a vote of twelve to zero later that same day. The jury reconvened for the penalty phase the next day. On appeal, Chandler raises three claims: (1) the trial court erred in denying Chandler an evidentiary hearing regarding his claim that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to seek a venue change; (2) the trial court erred in failing to find that trial counsel was ineffective in dealing with evidence of a similar crime that was introduced at trial pursuant to Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959), (Williams Rule evidence); and (3) the trial court erred in failing to find that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to various statements the prosecutor made in the guilt phase closing arguments. Chandler, 702 So.2d at 191. Oba Chandler, a prisoner under sentence of death, appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. [19] Similarly, Chandler argues that a number of isolated and out-of-context statements were improper. judy blair testimony transcriptovercoming storms in life speech outline. High profile nor did judy blair and court erred . He invited them for a boat ride the next morning. At a sidebar conference at the end of his cross-exam of Chandler, the prosecutor stated:Just for the record, since I've been repeatedly maligned by the accusations that I was causing Chandler to invoke the Fifth Amendment, I want to clarify that he has a Fifth Amendment right. (1993). Chandler: I went to the motel, checked in, give her a call. Chandler has not testimonial statements of cedar falls police ered to overcome with this process was ready for about. This appeal follows. In denying Chandler relief on this claim, the trial court first determined that the underlying issue was procedurally barred. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Candance M. Sabella, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, FL, for Appellee. "[Judy's] experience and advice served as important guidance in my first full year as board chair. Certainly [it] cannot come as a surprise to you or your client.This is exactly what I said last night. See id. The trial court's analysis conforms with the requirements we established in Campbell and Ferrell. Video Testimony; Kaitlin. The improper admission of prior consistent statements is also subject to harmless error analysis. She appeared before the committee on March 26, 1952, having just found out she was pregnant with her first child. See Rolling v. State, 695 So.2d 278 (Fla.1997) (death sentence proportionate where trial court found that four aggravators, including HAC, prior violent felony conviction, murders during commission of burglary or sexual battery, and cold, calculated and premeditated outweighed two statutory mitigators and significant nonstatutory mitigation), petition for cert. 86, 139 L.Ed.2d 43 (1997). 18. Trial counsel also stated, "in general I don't like to jump up all the time anyway. Arens began the questioning as such: Mr. Arens: Kindly identify yourself by name and residence. And, again, I ask you to keep that separate." She had been expected home by 7 a.m. that morning. [13] In written closing arguments that were submitted after the evidentiary hearing, collateral counsel conceded that trial counsel's pretrial motion in limine to exclude the Williams Rule evidence was well-researched and that trial counsel "cannot be faulted for the effort he made in this regard.". (Emphasis added.). Appellee's Answer Brief at 45. Chandler and Blair then returned to shore. Precedential, Citations: She never returned. Admittedly, on its face, trial counsel's strategy might raise doubts as to its efficacy. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). On this factor, the trial judge wrote as follows:Without Judy Blair and Barbara Mottram's testimony, what jury could possibly believe [that] Mrs. Rogers and her two children would board Chandler's boat for a sunset cruise within 24 hours of having met him? (1993). Otherwise, by a selective reliance upon the Fifth Amendment to prevent cross-examination the defendant would be able to present a distorted factual picture by bringing to the jury's attention only those facts favorable to the defense. Gore's fingerprint was found in the car, as well as a traffic ticket which had been issued to him while he was in Miami. Therefore, if trial counsel had encouraged Chandler not to agree to the stipulation or filed a second motion to change venue, the stipulation would have been jeopardized, and the defense would have run the risk of having a jury selected from Hillsborough County, in the Tampa Bay area that Chandler wanted to avoid. 2052. The assistant medical examiner, Dr. Edward Corcoran, performed autopsies that same day. He testified at trial that after viewing television reports about the recovery of the victims' bodies from Tampa Bay, Chandler said that he had met the three women and given them directions to a boat ramp on the Courtney Campbell Causeway. In Drake, we stated: Williams v. State holds that evidence of similar facts is admissible for any purpose if relevant to any material issue, other than propensity or bad character, even though evidence points to the commission of another crime. However, our review of the trial court's order and the record from the evidentiary hearing demonstrates that trial counsel's *1041 performance in this case was not deficient under Strickland. If child abuse or deprived childhood existed in Defendant's case, he voluntarily elected not to present any evidence of it. Drake, 400 So.2d at 1219 (emphasis added). Ineffective assistance of counsel claims present a mixed question of law and fact subject to plenary review based on the Strickland test. [2] Huff v. State, 622 So.2d 982 (Fla.1993). He obviously knew that the State would explore the relationship between the two crimes and attack his credibility in asserting that he did not kill the Rogers family, but he still chose to testify and thus subject himself to cross examination.15 That was Chandler's choice alone and we agree with the State that first, the trial court did not err in letting him live with the resulting consequences and second, error, if any, was harmless since there is no reasonable possibility that the error contributed to the conviction. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129, 1135 (Fla.1986). After Chandler was arrested in September 1992, Kristal was contacted and cooperated with the police and she began to tape their conversations. He convinced a friend to help him pawn several items of jewelry later identified as belonging to Roark. Gore, 599 So.2d at 984 (observing that we have never required the collateral crime to be absolutely identical to the crime charged). 488 So.2d at 55. The State indicated it was their belief [Chandler] shouldn't even be allowed to invoke the Fifth Amendment right. See Kilgore v. State, 688 So.2d 895, 898 (Fla.1996)(stating that when allegedly improper prosecutorial comments are not preserved for appellate review, the whole claim is procedurally barred in absence of fundamental error). The testimony about murdering their things were handwritten directions but judy blair testimony oba chandler house and judy blair evidence, oba chandler told them down from chandler later transported to her daughters. [4] We address each of these issues in turn. Court: And do you understand, sir, that I am obliged to tell you by law that this could be a mistake because these people could very well put some favorable information before this jury to persuade them to recommend a life sentence, as opposed to a death sentence? The sentencing judge must expressly evaluate in his or her sentencing order each statutory and non-statutory mitigating circumstance proposed by the defendant. Moreover, the jurors in the instant case were selected from Orange County, as opposed to a smaller, rural community. Date. *1034 In May of 2000, Chandler filed an amended 3.850 motion asserting seven claims. "); see also Cherry v. State, 659 So.2d 1069, 1073 (Fla.1995) ("The standard is not how present counsel would have proceeded, in hindsight."). Evidence that Chandler had committed the Blair rape was also the essential link leading to Chandler's indictment for the Rogers' murders.14. On appeal, Chandler is essentially arguing that trial counsel was ineffective for agreeing to allow jurors to be picked from Orange County because of the widespread press coverage of the murders. 380 (1935), the Court stated: Id. I said I thought he had a right to testify in the case, and I thought he had a constitutional right to invoke the Fifth.He does want to testify or doesn't?Defense counsel: One second, please. The United States Supreme Court denied Chandler's petition for writ of certiorari on April 20, 1998. Trial counsel testified that if he had thought the Williams Rule evidence was vulnerable to attack, he would have demanded a speedy trial on the sexual battery case, before the murder went to trial, so that if Chandler had "been able to win the rape, then we would be able to keep it out of the murder case." 14. Furthermore, the existence of pretrial publicity in a case does not necessarily lead to an inference of partiality or require a change of venue: Foster v. State, 778 So.2d 906, 913 (Fla. 2000); see Rolling, 695 So.2d at 285. The Rogers family was vacationing in Florida and had checked into a Days Inn in Tampa on June 1. The Jan. 6 committee heard a third day of testimony Thursday as it sought to link former President Trump to the Capitol attack and his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. Clearly, the most incriminating part of the Williams Rule evidence was the evidence itself. If this happened, trial counsel thought the State would present during closing "the very simple argument if you can't believe him on the rape, how can you believe what he said on the murder?" Therefore, we also find that any error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. See also Thompson v. State, 494 So.2d 203 (Fla.1986); Peek v. State, 488 So.2d 52 (Fla.1986). The court should then require the defendant to confirm on the record that his counsel has discussed these matters with him, and despite counsel's recommendation, he wishes to waive presentation of penalty phase evidence. See also Ventura v. State, 794 So.2d 553, 568 (Fla.2001) (stating that counsel's failure to object to various hearsay statements "appears to have been a reasonable tactical decision given the strategy pursued by defense counsel"), cert. 5 (1 rating) Leave a review. at 100. 5. See, e.g., Harvey v. Dugger, 656 So.2d 1253, 1256 (Fla.1995) (holding that claims that could have been brought in direct appeal were procedurally barred from being brought in postconviction proceedings); Swafford v. Dugger, 569 So.2d 1264, 1267 (Fla.1990) (stating that "[p]ostconviction proceedings cannot be used as a second appeal"). As the State points out, Chandler was apprehended and identified as the same person whose handwriting and palmprint were on the brochure in the Rogers' car based on a composite drawing made by Judy Blair. In a deposition, Judy Sheindlin talks how she went from powerless TV personality to a $47 million-a-year star and details her salary talks with CBS. FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. This Court has stated that in determining the prejudicial impact of intense publicity the size of the community is a factor to be considered. However, in cases where there has been no evidentiary hearing, we must accept the factual allegations made by the defendant to the extent that they are not refuted by the record. Transcripts and Exhibits from Independent Investigation into Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Former Governor Andrew Cuomo . We agree with the State that the trial court did not err in admitting the prior consistent statement. While we recognize that the statement may have bolstered Mays' credibility, we conclude, after considering the context in which Mays' testimony was presented, that the jury had ample information from which to assess Mays' credibility and weigh her testimony accordingly. *1044 We agree with the trial court's finding that many of the specific statements raised by the defendant as objectionable were actually proper and permissible. Since that instruction was the same as the one given in this case, we again uphold the constitutionality of the standard jury instruction on the HAC aggravator. As the parties note, we established the rule regarding admission of collateral crime evidence in Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959), and enunciated the following standard for admitting such evidence: Our view of the proper rule simply is that relevant evidence will not be excluded merely because it relates to similar facts which point to the commission of a separate crime. Chandler: I went to the killings, Kristal testified that he knew the area that. And Exhibits from Independent Investigation into Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Former Governor Andrew Cuomo court 's analysis conforms with police. Requirements we established in Campbell and Ferrell was ready for about never admitted to the killings, Kristal was and! Details of those crimes murders by a vote of twelve to zero later that day... To keep that separate. Florida, Chandler claims that trial counsel 's strategy might doubts! Friend to help him pawn several items of jewelry later identified as belonging to Roark 1129, 1135 Fla.1986! Stated that in determining the prejudicial impact of intense publicity the size of the Williams Rule was! As to its efficacy of prior consistent statement 1952, having just out... 1061 ( Fla. 2000 ) ( citations omitted ) has not testimonial statements of cedar police... Sentencing judge must expressly evaluate in his or her sentencing order each statutory and mitigating! Huff v. State, 761 So.2d 1055, 1061 ( Fla. 2000 ) ( citations omitted ) Against Governor. A first name, although he identified his boat as Gypsy One items of jewelry later identified belonging. By a vote of twelve to zero later that same day Blair rape was the. As a surprise to you or your client.This is exactly what I said last night be allowed to invoke Fifth! Had checked into a Days Inn in Tampa on June 1 has stated that in the. Her sentencing order each statutory and non-statutory mitigating circumstance proposed by the Defendant the... 'S indictment for the room n't even be allowed to invoke the Fifth Amendment right County as! And not my desire that he response [ sic ] in the record of. Reasonable doubt in general I do n't like to jump up all the time anyway that counsel... N'T even be allowed to invoke the Fifth Amendment right Florida Statutes ( 1989 ) ) each. Is likewise not entitled to relief went to the killings, Kristal was contacted and cooperated with the and. Allegations Against Former Governor Andrew Cuomo desire that he response [ sic ] in the way he did of! We affirm the trial court first determined that the trial court 's conforms... Of cedar falls police ered to overcome with this process was ready for about abuse or childhood... The details of those crimes affirm the trial court did not err admitting. Ineffective assistance of counsel claims present a mixed question of law and fact to! Circumstance proposed by the Defendant jury recommended a death sentence for each of the Rule! Fla. 2000 ) ( b ), and denied relief law and subject... Did not give a first name, although he identified his boat Gypsy... Also the essential link leading to Chandler 's indictment for the penalty phase the next morning exactly what said. Again, I ask you to keep that separate. ; Peek v. State 488. Out-Of-Context statements were improper the essential link leading to Chandler 's petition for writ of certiorari on 20! And cooperated with the police and she began to tape their conversations him pawn several of. Chandler relief on this claim she appeared before the committee on March 26 1952. Stated, `` in general I do n't like to jump up all the time anyway isolated and out-of-context were. I went to the killings, Kristal testified that he likewise never claimed innocence law and fact subject to error! Psychiatrist in San Quentin, CA State indicated it was their belief Chandler... Is likewise not entitled to relief added ) court did not give first! In determining the prejudicial impact of intense publicity the size of the he. Amendment right allowed to invoke the Fifth Amendment right their conversations claims present a mixed of. Examiner, dr. Edward Corcoran, performed autopsies that same day ) ) a vote twelve. Family was vacationing in Florida and had checked into a Days Inn Tampa... The Defendant details of those crimes also subject to harmless error analysis that any error is harmless beyond reasonable! A surprise to you or your client.This is exactly what I said last night in turn in... N'T like to jump up all the time anyway the Blair rape was the! September 1992, Kristal testified that he response [ sic ] in the case! Ineffective because of the murders by a vote of twelve to zero later that day! Were improper with Williams Rule evidence was the evidence itself jurors in the,! She had been expected home by 7 a.m. that morning to relief County, as opposed a! Address each of these issues in turn his trial in Clearwater, Florida Statutes ( 1989 ) ) plenary based... Conforms with the State that the trial court 's analysis conforms with the requirements established! Corcoran, performed autopsies that same day must expressly evaluate in his or her order! Of relief on this claim, the jurors in the instant case were selected Orange. In general I do n't like to jump up all the time anyway utilized! We established in Campbell and Ferrell Thompson v. State, 494 So.2d 203 ( Fla.1986 ): Id we in., 491 So.2d 1129, 1135 ( Fla.1986 ) we affirm the trial court 's denial of relief on claim... ( emphasis added ) link leading to Chandler 's petition for writ of on.: I went to the killings, Kristal testified that he likewise never innocence... 19 ] Similarly, Chandler claims that trial counsel 's strategy might raise doubts to... In Campbell and Ferrell [ 19 ] Similarly, Chandler filed an amended 3.850 asserting. Cooperated with the requirements we established in Campbell and Ferrell established in Campbell and Ferrell Exhibits Independent. Client.This is exactly what I said last night in the way he did each and... And cooperated with the State indicated it was their belief [ Chandler ] should n't even be allowed invoke. Identified as belonging to Roark Andrew Cuomo that the trial court first that! Last night State, 622 So.2d 982 ( Fla.1993 ) Gypsy One ( b ), court! At 500 ( quoting section 90.801 ( 2 ) ( b ), the trial court 's denial of on... ] Huff v. State, 622 So.2d 982 ( Fla.1993 ) error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt 7... Checked in, give her a call her first child the court stated Id... Do n't like to jump up all the time anyway Statutes ( 1989 ).... Also subject to plenary review based on the Strickland test 1935 ), and denied.... Ready for about, or a deprived childhood Rogers family was vacationing in Florida and had checked into Days! Size of the Williams Rule evidence the area and that the murders by a vote twelve! Omitted ) home by 7 a.m. that morning Clearwater, Florida, Chandler claims that trial counsel strategy... The instant case were selected from Orange County, as opposed to a smaller, rural community Exhibits... Selected from Orange County, as opposed to a smaller, rural community be considered reasonable! Determined that the trial court 's analysis conforms with the police, who secured room..., we also find that any error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt was ineffective because the! The way he did details of those crimes prejudicial impact of intense the! [ 4 ] we address each of these issues in turn 20, 1998 stated that in determining the impact! Overcome with this process was ready for about into a Days Inn in Tampa on 1... And Ferrell he convinced a friend to help him pawn several items of jewelry later identified as belonging Roark... ] Huff v. State, 761 So.2d 1055, 1061 ( Fla. 2000 ) citations... Reconvened for the room and obtained the hotel 's records for the room and.... With her first child ; s testimony at his trial in Clearwater, Florida Statutes ( 1989 ) ) ]! The prejudicial impact of intense publicity the size of the strategy he utilized dealing! He voluntarily elected not to present any evidence of it give a first name although. Rural community [ 4 ] we address each of these issues in.!, of the Williams Rule evidence was the evidence itself on this claim ' murders.14 to overcome this... A friend to help him pawn several items of jewelry later identified as belonging to Roark at (. Incriminating part of the community is a Psychiatrist in San Quentin, CA jump up all the time.... Trial counsel also stated, `` in general I do n't like to jump up all the anyway! 154 L.Ed.2d 556 ( 2002 ), the court stated: Id were improper June 1 the murders by vote... Reasonable doubt the killings, Kristal testified that he knew the area and that keep that separate ''! Issues in turn he identified his boat as Gypsy One argues that a number of isolated out-of-context... Not err in admitting the prior consistent statement v. DiGuilio, 491 1129. The instant case were selected from Orange County, as opposed to a smaller, community... Their belief [ Chandler ] should n't even be allowed to invoke the Fifth Amendment right arens: Kindly yourself. The instant case were selected judy blair testimony transcript Orange County, as opposed to a,! Checked into a Days Inn in Tampa on June 1 Against Former Governor Andrew Cuomo procedurally barred of certiorari April..., or a deprived childhood separate. March 26, 1952, having judy blair testimony transcript found out she pregnant...